[an error occurred while processing this directive] Return of the King - http://www.mmcafe.com/ Forums


Original message ([an error occurred while processing this directive] Views )[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Minuteman
68th Post



user profileedit/delete message

Occasional Customer

"Return of the King" , posted Thu 18 Dec 16:33post reply


So, anyone else see "Return of the King" yet? I just got back from seeing it, and I really enjoyed it. But, man, it's almost slightly TOO long. They could have chopped out some of the longer fight scenes and had the final 20 minutes end at the 3hr. mark. I don't wanna spoil anything, but watch out for the final ~20 minutes...

I was sitting down for nearly 4 hrs. straight (2:50pm - 6:40pm) and I'm tall (6'7") so my damn legs hurt, plus it was hot in the theater.

/end complain mode






Replies:

talbaineric
5655th Post



user profileedit/delete message

Platinum Carpet V.I.P- Board Master





"Re(1):Return of the King" , posted Thu 18 Dec 16:51post reply


Wow! 4 hours!

I wanna go see it just for the sake of going to see it. I'm not a big LoTR fan. But I wanna see if I can catch it. Looks better than two towers.






TALBAINANDCAMMY.COM! Celebrating 3 years of T&C Fanship.

Minuteman
69th Post



user profileedit/delete message

Occasional Customer

"Re(2):Return of the King" , posted Thu 18 Dec 17:19post reply


quote:
Looks better than two towers.



I did enjoy this more than LOtR:TT.
I'd rank the three films from:

1 - Fellowship of the Ring
2 - Return of the King
3 - Two Towers





Ikari Loona
57th Post



user profileedit/delete message

Occasional Customer

"Re(1):Return of the King" , posted Thu 18 Dec 18:36post reply


There's only one scene for the book I really want to see in the movie, so I gotta ask to those who have seen it if it's there:



Spoiler (Highlight to view) -
Do we get to see Eowyn(sp?) chop off a Nazgul's head?...
(the Nazgul are those big dark flying creatures the ring wraiths use for aerial transportation and scouting)


End of Spoiler







Puchu?

"Beat the machine that works in your head!" - Guano Apes "Open Your Eyes"

RugalBernstein
4816th Post



user profileedit/delete message

Platinum Carpet V.I.P- Board Master





"Re(2):Return of the King" , posted Thu 18 Dec 18:49post reply




Spoiler (Highlight to view) -
Yes.

End of Spoiler








Best site EVER: Link Here

Dragon-warrior
1062th Post



user profileedit/delete message

Red Carpet Premium Member




"Re(3):Return of the King" , posted Thu 18 Dec 19:25post reply




Spoiler (Highlight to view) -
the undead army just kicked serious ass too much ^^

End of Spoiler







Juke Joint Jezebel
2580th Post



user profileedit/delete message

Platinum Carpet V.I.P- Board Master





"Re(1):Return of the King" , posted Thu 18 Dec 20:06post reply


imo, it was the best ending to a movie (series or otherwise) i've ever seen. if it weren't for the final twenty minutes, and instead ended with

Spoiler (Highlight to view) -
the king getting crowned or whatever else,

End of Spoiler

it would've been "just another ending" in my book. it tied everything up and showed how everyone turned out. i couldn't have thought of a more beautiful end to an awesome trilogy





``Today for a lark let's visit the plains. I'm sure we'll find something to entertain us.''

Hagen de Merak
592th Post



user profileedit/delete message

New Red Carpet Member



"Re(4):Return of the King" , posted Thu 18 Dec 20:09post reply




Spoiler (Highlight to view) -
as soon as i saw them float through the water i knew it was over.

End of Spoiler







Hungrywolf
2565th Post



user profileedit/delete message

Platinum Carpet V.I.P- Board Master





"Re(2):Return of the King" , posted Thu 18 Dec 23:09post reply


quote:
There's only one scene for the book I really want to see in the movie, so I gotta ask to those who have seen it if it's there:







Spoiler (Highlight to view) -
I think Eowyn was my favorite character in the movie because of when she did that and when she rode under the elephant thing with two swords and took it out at the legs. She was awesome. Also I like Sam a lot more than Frodo now, though I still like Frodo.

End of Spoiler



I still need to finish reading The Two Towers and The Return of the King to see what about the movies of those books disappoints me.



Spoiler (Highlight to view) -
I'm glad that they intro to the movie showed how Gollum got the ring though.

End of Spoiler








"no again my apoligizes for anyone i offend!!!!!"
Hungry Like the Wolf

CrazyMike
784th Post



user profileedit/delete message

Red Carpet Regular Member+



"Re(3):Return of the King" , posted Fri 19 Dec 01:05post reply


Just got back from seeing it tonight. Indeed it did not disappoint. As for what it left out of the books...



Spoiler (Highlight to view) -
They left out the scene at the end where Saruman and "evil" men take over the Shire and Frodo and the rest come back to kick him out. He then is stabbed by Wormtongue.

End of Spoiler



And yes the Dead Army was pretty sweet, especially when....



Spoiler (Highlight to view) -
They just swarm over those elephants and seemingly devour it like ants

End of Spoiler







Juke Joint Jezebel
2582th Post



user profileedit/delete message

Platinum Carpet V.I.P- Board Master





"Re(4):Return of the King" , posted Fri 19 Dec 01:42post reply


quote:
And yes the Dead Army was pretty sweet, especially when....



Spoiler (Highlight to view) -
when i saw them teeming out of the boats, i knew the battle was already over. when the Dead swarms galloped across the river ... what a sight

End of Spoiler







``Today for a lark let's visit the plains. I'm sure we'll find something to entertain us.''

aderack
107th Post



user profileedit/delete message

Regular Customer

"Re(4):Return of the King" , posted Fri 19 Dec 06:35:post reply


quote:
Just got back from seeing it tonight. Indeed it did not disappoint. As for what it left out of the books...

Jackson never filmed that scene; he felt it anticlimactic. He has a different fate for those characters planned for the extended DVD.

The above ordering is about accurate. This one is almost as good as Fellowship (and is in fact the only theatrical version which has felt entirely adequate to me). This is largely due to the fact that it ties up so many threads (down to the smallest things that you wouldn't have realized needed closure) that it feels like one extended burst of payoff for having spent the time with the previous two movies.

One other note: god, this movie is violent. By comparison to its predecessors, anyway. Expect many stabbings, impalings, bludgeonings, meaty punches-to-the-face, and other weirdness. And most of it's pretty personal and graphic, for as far as it goes.

It works, of course. And it sets a certain tone. Not something that I anticipated, however.

Hell. One more note. Why not.

Theoden kicks ass. He just does. In the same way that Boromir did.





EricJonRösselWaugh
YOU CANNOT STOP ME WITH JUST A PARAMECIUM!

[this message was edited by aderack on Fri 19 Dec 06:38]

Time Mage
1729th Post



user profileedit/delete message

Tailored Carpet V.I.P- Platinum Member





"Re(1):Return of the King" , posted Fri 19 Dec 07:13post reply


First, I LOVE this movie. Second, it was short in my opinion. And finally,

Spoiler (Highlight to view) -
I almost jumped from my sit when the Rohirrim charged (What a great scene!!)

End of Spoiler



I think this is the best of the trilogy, because it gives the best atmosphere. It's one of those films that has to be watched in a theater.






Use Time Magic to control time and space. Extremely useful allies.

Freeter
4115th Post



user profileedit/delete message

Platinum Carpet V.I.P- Board Master





"Re(2):Return of the King" , posted Fri 19 Dec 08:59post reply


quote:
It's one of those films that has to be watched in a theater.



Especially to see everyone have to sit through that hella long ending and complain. That was the funniest (although unintentional) moment of the whole film.

I'd rank Fellowship above this, but it's still a very good film. Just be prepared for one ending sequence after another...





shinsei19
138th Post



user profileedit/delete message

Regular Customer

"Re(3):Return of the King" , posted Fri 19 Dec 11:48post reply


to me ROTK is one of the greatest films in history for many reasons. You can't have an epic story with a crappy-short ending. There are threads that need to be tied up, resolution to the events of war and their repercussions.

I think what's kind of interesting is if you take all three movies as one movie, as Tolkien viewed the 'books' (originally he wanted it published as a single volume), it really does build up to this giant climax in ROTK with a nice, suitable falling action/conclusion at the end.

Eh, but just my opinion...the music btw is some of the best I've ever heard onscreen...it's truly glorious





Chyrebulis
37th Post



user profileedit/delete message

Rare Customer

"Re(4):Return of the King" , posted Fri 19 Dec 21:40post reply


quote:
to me ROTK is one of the greatest films in history for many reasons.


Just saw it. I cried, more than once. This trilogy has been just freaking awesome, so much cool stuff. Really the only complaint I have for RoTK is some questionable editing, (Compared to the Prologue in FotR and the Balrog sequence opening TT the smeagol flashback was a weak opening scene) but these are minor quibbles. A great movie interpretation of some great books.

Furthermore, I am glad to note that in the grand RPG tradition Sauron was a load-bearing boss.





KTallguy
317th Post



user profileedit/delete message

Bronze Customer


"Re(5):Return of the King" , posted Sat 20 Dec 00:23post reply


That film is truly epic.

I walked out of that theater with a smile on my face. It's one of the best movies I've seen in years.

I'm getting the box set now =)





"Temae ja yaku busoku nan da yo!"

Luisinan
627th Post



user profileedit/delete message

Red Carpet Regular Member



"Re(6):Return of the King" , posted Sat 20 Dec 00:47post reply


I shed a few tears on several occassions. I just couldn't help it. This movie was too much for me. Okay, I'm not gonna post in spoiler text, so stop reading if you haven't watched the movie. Besides, you shouldn't be posting in this thread if you haven't watched the movie. Anyway here are my favorite scenes.

0. Gandalf bopping Denethor in the head scenes. Denethor is such a 'pendejo'. It was so good watching Gandalf push him around. Goodness, I hate Denethor. Flipping 'burning man'. His final scene was great (bit funny too).
1. Rohirrims march into the Mordor army.
2. Eowyn and Merry's slaying of the Witch King. I was crying here man. Ever since Fellowship, I was looking forward to seeing this scene. This was the scene I wanted to watch since the end of Fellowship.
3. Death of Theoden.
4. Aragorn, Legolas and Gimli boarding off the ship. That was just such a classic, "We are gonna so kick your ass" scene.
5. Reunification of the Fellowship.
6. Crowning of the King
7. Departure of Frodo and Bilbo. I was falling apart by now.

Goodness, Eowyn and Merry's slaying of the Witchking will forever be remembered. I loved that scene so much.

And IMO, I don't think the ending was too long. It was appropriate. And I'm glad they didn't have the scouring of the Shire. Anti-climactic is a good description of that episode.

Overall, I didn't think I'd like RoTK above Fellowship, but I do. Just because RoTK brought out so much emotion in me. RoTK used up all the pent up emotion very well.

Sigh. Sigh. Sigh. Time to go back and watch it.

Oh, and for those that haven't read the book, a scene that got cut out, wasn't important but thought woulda been cool to have included, was (don't read the following spoiler if you plan to or are reading LoTR):



Spoiler (Highlight to view) -

In the last battle scene, after Aragorn goes up to the gate and challenges Sauron to come out and fight, a character named "Mouth of Sauron" comes out and presents Frodo's clothes (chainmail, cloak and sword). That was a great, "oh shit, we're gonna die scene." Not important but woulda been nice.


End of Spoiler







StickClick
161th Post



user profileedit/delete message

Regular Customer

"Re(7):Return of the King" , posted Sat 20 Dec 20:08post reply


Anyone who bitches about the ending must die. It was wholly necessary... not to mention, completely satisfying.


I'm dying to see this again. WITHOUT a scumbag audience that laughs at everything and talks the entire time.





Groove.
[ C l i c k - s t i c k . com ]

shinsei19
139th Post



user profileedit/delete message

Regular Customer

"Re(8):Return of the King" , posted Sat 20 Dec 20:47post reply


Luisinan, the scene you mention in the spoiler will be in the EE version of the movie ^_^

Spoiler/rumor EE stuff:
http://www.aintitcool.com/display.cgi?id=16689

man I can't wait to see it again!!!





Luisinan
633th Post



user profileedit/delete message

Red Carpet Regular Member



"Re(9):Return of the King" , posted Sat 20 Dec 22:40post reply


quote:
Luisinan, the scene you mention in the spoiler will be in the EE version of the movie ^_^

Spoiler/rumor EE stuff:
http://www.aintitcool.com/display.cgi?id=16689

man I can't wait to see it again!!!



That's good to hear. I always thought that was an important scene, even though it didn't really move the plot forward. I'm glad it'll be inserted. I was hoping on it.

That scene always made me cringe when I would read it.






Bored? "160"

Fygee
901th Post



user profileedit/delete message

Red Carpet Regular Member++



"Re(8):Return of the King" , posted Sun 21 Dec 00:51post reply


quote:
I'm dying to see this again. WITHOUT a scumbag audience that laughs at everything and talks the entire time.



Tell me about it. I just got back from seeing it and we had a really immature audience that talked and laughed during dramatic scenes.

Overall it was a really great movie, but I was disappointed by the total lack of Sarumon, and the fact that Gandalf didn't use ANY magic at all aside from the part where he scares off the dragons.





Luisinan
635th Post



user profileedit/delete message

Red Carpet Regular Member



"Re(9):Return of the King" , posted Sun 21 Dec 02:27:post reply


quote:

Overall it was a really great movie, but I was disappointed by the total lack of Sarumon, and the fact that Gandalf didn't use ANY magic at all aside from the part where he scares off the dragons.



Love it or hate it, that was Tolkien's style. He was very subtle about magic. For example, the Elves are always appearing unnoticed, their cloaks make perfect camoflauge, and their bread is super nutricious. All Elf magic, but not blatant. Time also stands still in Rivendell and Lorien. The older Elves also have precognitive abilities but they're not showy about it. Elven swords are also special. Frodo's glows when Orcs are nearby. And Aragorn's reforged sword emits flames (briefly seen in the movie). Also, remember when Sam thinks it's a shame they used their Elf rope to climb down the cliff, and then the rope unties itself and falls down? Elf magic again.

Gandalf is also subtle. He does most of his magic through 'Jedi mind tricks' that is, his speech changes things (heals Theoden, entrances enemies, depowers Saruman). I think the only time he was showy was when they needed a fire while stuck on a mountain top and he made a fireball. Even then, he said, he shouldn't have done it cause it revealed himself to the world. Or something like that.

Even the bad guys are subtle. The mere prescence of the Ringwraithes send you running to the hills. Everything about them is poisonous. Any type of contact with them is bad. The film didn't elaborate on it, but Merry and Eowyn were injured after they killed the Witch King. Frodo had a permanent injury from his earlier attack.

Anyway, I love this style of magic. Don't like the showy stuff too much.

(yes. I could talk forever about Tolkien.)






Bored? "160"

[this message was edited by Luisinan on Sun 21 Dec 02:32]

Juke Joint Jezebel
2588th Post



user profileedit/delete message

Platinum Carpet V.I.P- Board Master





"Re(10):Return of the King" , posted Sun 21 Dec 03:38:post reply


the magic in that world is nice. it has a sort of mysticism to it. i remember my friends were complaining about Gandalf and his use of magic. in two (maybe more) different battles, instead of setting the rows of enemy armies on fire, he simply blinded them with light. all i said was "maybe that's how it was in the book" (none of us had read any of it yet). it's good to hear someone else's take on it that has actually read the books

oh yeah, that's one downside of going to the theater. there's always gonna be a couple of people that just can't wait to ruin it for you. that's why i love going to the movies early (10am or some time around noon) before the monkeys get out of school/work. i also like going late (any time around/after midnight) but lots of jerks come out at that hour too. and of course, not everyone has that luxury so ..





Jhawy (11:43:30 PM): We'll team up and suck all the dick and get rich.

[this message was edited by Juke Joint Jezebel on Sun 21 Dec 03:54]

Hungrywolf
2574th Post



user profileedit/delete message

Platinum Carpet V.I.P- Board Master





"Re(10):Return of the King" , posted Sun 21 Dec 11:36post reply


quote:
Luisinan, the scene you mention in the spoiler will be in the EE version of the movie ^_^

Spoiler/rumor EE stuff:
http://www.aintitcool.com/display.cgi?id=16689

man I can't wait to see it again!!!


That's good to hear. I always thought that was an important scene, even though it didn't really move the plot forward. I'm glad it'll be inserted. I was hoping on it.

That scene always made me cringe when I would read it.



I'm glad to hear about the other scenes that will be restored too. Especially



Spoiler (Highlight to view) -
the one between Eowyn and Faramir.

End of Spoiler








"no again my apoligizes for anyone i offend!!!!!"
Hungry Like the Wolf

Time Mage
1736th Post



user profileedit/delete message

Tailored Carpet V.I.P- Platinum Member





"Re(10):Return of the King" , posted Sun 21 Dec 13:37post reply


quote:

Love it or hate it, that was Tolkien's style.


And even it is exaggerated in the films. Theoden's transformation is much more subtle in the books, kind of a change of mentality, not a real physical change. He looks younger and stronger, but because his attitude, his stronger voice, his regained self-confidence, and not because he lost the wrinkles of his face. And Gandalf doesn't "dispel" him, he gives him his lost courage, by talking to him and reconforting his heart. And even if it's not very spectacular, it's still magic.

Also, "The Eye" is more like a representation of Sauron, unlike the films, in which he is a lighthouse!!






Use Time Magic to control time and space. Extremely useful allies.

Luisinan
636th Post



user profileedit/delete message

Red Carpet Regular Member



"Re(2):Re(10):Return of the King" , posted Sun 21 Dec 15:12post reply


quote:

Also, "The Eye" is more like a representation of Sauron, unlike the films, in which he is a lighthouse!!



ha ha ha. Argueably, IMO, the greatest fantasy villain of all time, is a lighthouse.

I didn't mind most of the changes or interpretations made by Jackson. Not even Sauron as a Lighthouse (even though its kinda funny and campy).

There is one thing I wish Jackson exagerrated: The Nazgul. In the books, they don't do a whole lot of battling. I mean, they do, but Tolkien doesn't go into detail. Only specific thing he mentions is the Witchkings battle and death with Eowyn and Merry. Jackson had a lot of swooping Nazgul attacks. I wanted more Nazgul versus a person scenes.

On the other hand, remember when the Witchking says he'll 'take care of the wizard.' There's a rumor in AICN, that in the extended edition



Spoiler (Highlight to view) -
The Witchking has a scene where he breaks Gandalf's staff. That's why you don't see Gandalf with his staff after the Minas Tirith battle.

End of Spoiler



Denethor will forever be a punk ass fool. Just like Saruman.






Bored? "160"

trufenix
82th Post



user profileedit/delete message

Occasional Customer

"beat me to it." , posted Mon 22 Dec 07:38post reply


I was going to mention that th reason you didn't seen Gandalf do any magic later on is because at some point his staff just vanished altogether from the movie and their staff is really the source of the wizard councils power (hence breaking the staff is essentially casting them out of the council).

It is good to hear that there may be some explanation for it on the Extended cut.

As for the Nazgul, I think it would've been really campy to watch them owning people on foot. They're gonna get off their giant flying things and then start punching people? Nah. I think it was cool enough seeing bounce those four guys off the top of that building.

Man, everytime I think about this movie it gets better. Those guys bouncing off that shack, the heads being catapulted, the conversation between Faramir and Denethor. Gimli's little speech outside the cave.

And for the first time, I didn't hate the elven stuff. In the other two movies, the pace of the film slowed down to a CRAWL on any elf intensive scenes (Arwen / Agent Elrond anyone?), but in this one, it was really tasteful.

All great stuff.

-F.





Resistance is flammable! No one can snuff my flames!

Juke Joint Jezebel
2589th Post



user profileedit/delete message

Platinum Carpet V.I.P- Board Master





"Re(1):beat me to it." , posted Mon 22 Dec 10:16post reply


quote:
the heads being catapulted

i love it when people use references to history in their works. this was taken from the Crusades. (i forgot what happened exactly. i was obsessed with this stuff when i was a kid, but that was a long time ago.) it might've been the Christians that used that as a scare tactic





Jhawy (5:35:59 AM): I'm doing it in character too so he'll think that it's still a real girl.
Ran (5:36:28 AM): ^_________________________^

Ven
18th Post



user profileedit/delete message

New Customer

"Re(1):Return of the King" , posted Mon 22 Dec 12:56post reply


Jackson's stuff seems to coincide with lots and lots of people's interpretations of the books, I guess.

But not mine. I walked out feeling like I had been robbed.

To me, Jackson sucked out nearly all of the conflict, and amplified every battle to Matrixy, over-the-top status. And if I see wind pass dramatically through Orlando Bloom's hair one more time...

Not to mention the "Happy Homo Hobbits".

It's 4 hours that I want back. Unfortunately, the theatre can't refund my time.

In my opinion, him leaving scenes out is just serving to hype up the DVD sales, where the real profits will be made.

And I've seen scores of action figures and other promo material. I believe that the whole series of movies played to the majority of consumers, at the complete expense of the original source material. But most things are like that.

And in the face of overwhelming popularity, what I think doesn't give a damn. Glad you all enjoyed it, though.

- Ven





Juan
3697th Post



user profileedit/delete message

Platinum Carpet V.I.P- Board Master





"Re(2):Return of the King" , posted Mon 22 Dec 13:25:post reply


How was it Matrixy?

quote:
Not to mention the "Happy Homo Hobbits".


The "Happy Homo Hobbits" moments didnt really bother me. It seemed more like a brother-like relationship (specially after going through all that horrible stuff and showing loyalship no matter what.) Plus you know that Sam was always thinking about that girl back at the Shire.

But thats just me, all the other morons on the theater were laughing at those moments the whole time along with the half dead men that refused to stop coughing.





turtley enough for the turtle club

[this message was edited by Juan on Mon 22 Dec 13:38]

iggy
2331th Post



user profileedit/delete message

Platinum Carpet V.I.P- Board Master





"Re(2):Return of the King" , posted Mon 22 Dec 13:39post reply


quote:
Not to mention the "Happy Homo Hobbits".

Nothing about the movies (I haven't seen either) but the "Happy Homo Hobbits" were in the books. I mean, I saw it clearly when I read them, and I hadn't even began my puberty back then. I mean, I was still a child with a pure heart.
Not that I'm not anymore. It's just that my childish purety expresses itself in a different way now. Yes, right.





Luisinan
637th Post



user profileedit/delete message

Red Carpet Regular Member



"Re(2):Return of the King" , posted Mon 22 Dec 13:45post reply


quote:

And in the face of overwhelming popularity, what I think doesn't give a damn. Glad you all enjoyed it, though.

- Ven



Your opinion counts... for nothing! Just kidding.

The deep love between Frodo and Sam was in the books. It just looks a bit homoerotic when you actually watch it in film. But their friendship was hardcore in the books. And there weren't any homosexual inferences in the books either. Sometimes, people feel uncomfortable when men show affection to othe rmen and quickly think they're gay or something else. But anyway...

BTW, Sam and Rose had like 13 or 15 children. They went at it like RABBITS. Sam's my favorite LOTR character. Probably my favorite literary character too.






Bored? "160"

Juke Joint Jezebel
2592th Post



user profileedit/delete message

Platinum Carpet V.I.P- Board Master





"Re(3):Return of the King" , posted Mon 22 Dec 13:55post reply


Link Here





Jhawy (5:35:59 AM): I'm doing it in character too so he'll think that it's still a real girl.
Ran (5:36:28 AM): ^_________________________^

Artano
2th Post



user profileedit/delete message

New Customer

"Re(4):Return of the King" , posted Mon 22 Dec 15:12post reply


Hi

About the "Happy Homo Hobbits", you must remember that in the books, Frodo was around 20 years older than Sam....so their relationship it's more like "Father-Son" or "big brother" than anything else...

BTW, it's stated in one of Tolkien's bios that the four friend hobbitses are somehow related to Tolkien himself, and three of his friends who went to world war I...(two of them died)...

Bye





Krzyzewski Man
453th Post



user profileedit/delete message

Gold Customer


"Re(5):Return of the King" , posted Mon 22 Dec 15:39post reply


Hi.

About the Happy Homo Hobbits, you must remember that this book was written by a British guy.

...

Not to allege any unusual activities by my neighbors across the pond, of course. Far from it. But, ah... anyway.





Press be asking do I care for sodomy
I don't know yeah probably
-Robbie Williams
IAMSIPMMAOLC!!!

CrazyMike
790th Post



user profileedit/delete message

Red Carpet Regular Member+



"Re(6):Return of the King" , posted Mon 22 Dec 16:03post reply


Hmm well for the bit about the heads being catapulted into the castles, I believe during the dark ages in Europe, it was not uncommon for warring factions to launch black plague infected heads into the castles of the enemies. Or maybe it was whole bodies they launched, I forget. Primitive bio-warfare.





Juke Joint Jezebel
2593th Post



user profileedit/delete message

Platinum Carpet V.I.P- Board Master





"Re(7):Return of the King" , posted Mon 22 Dec 18:02post reply


quote:
Hmm well for the bit about the heads being catapulted into the castles, I believe during the dark ages in Europe, it was not uncommon for warring factions to launch black plague infected heads into the castles of the enemies. Or maybe it was whole bodies they launched, I forget. Primitive bio-warfare.


that's awesome. i seriously have to find more books on old warfare. by the way, that's a perfect explanation for THIS. particularly, the disease cloud aura





i kicked the riddle in the middle when she walked on by

Zazzarius
276th Post



user profileedit/delete message

Copper Customer


"Re(8):Return of the King" , posted Mon 22 Dec 20:03post reply


quote:

Furthermore, I am glad to note that in the grand RPG tradition Sauron was a load-bearing boss.

being that most rpgs have some basis in the Tolkien fantasy tradition, i'd say that Sauron is the first load bearing boss ever

though, I wanted more Witch King asskicking . . . it harkened back to the Fellowship's first scene with Sauron and his Thundrous DOOM MACE™

it was a great movie . . . makes me wonder why there aren't more helpful undead armies . . .





Burning Ranger
596th Post



user profileedit/delete message

New Red Carpet Member



"Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow..." , posted Mon 22 Dec 20:54post reply


I saw the movie, and I'll say what I've said about the entire LOTR trilogy: it's a good movie, but like Star Wars, it is WAY OVERRATED. Plus, it should be a crime to make movies THAT long.

Anyway, I think the most noteworthy thing about the LOTR theater experience was the previews. Of course, we have Spiderman 2 coming up. But the movie I really want to see is Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow. It's got that really cool retro-adventure feel that interests me like the original League of Extraordinary Gentlemen comic and other retro adventure movies like the Indiana Jones films. After watching the trailer for this movie, I can't wait to see the finished product.

And in case you're wondering, the trailer is online at http://www.skycaptain.com /.





Advanced Cyborg E. Branger AKA Burning Ranger

"Never underestimate the predictabilty of stupidity." -Vinnie Jones from SNATCH

gigaton
5th Post



user profileedit/delete message

New Customer

"Re(1):Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow.." , posted Mon 22 Dec 21:12post reply


The only reason why the relationship between The Hobbits seems 'Happy Homo' is because of our mindset today in the 21st century in which it is 'bad' for men to display any type of overt emotion or love for one another in a brotherly fashion.

Try and consider the context of the setting (A deep dark war in an ancient medevial world where real bonds of friendship/brotherhood/love /really/ count and matter) and then rethink the relationship between The Hobbits.





Gen
2355th Post



user profileedit/delete message

Platinum Carpet V.I.P- Board Master





"Re(2):Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow.." , posted Tue 23 Dec 00:48post reply


quote:
The only reason why the relationship between The Hobbits seems 'Happy Homo' is because of our mindset today in the 21st century in which it is 'bad' for men to display any type of overt emotion or love for one another in a brotherly fashion.

Try and consider the context of the setting (A deep dark war in an ancient medevial world where real bonds of friendship/brotherhood/love /really/ count and matter) and then rethink the relationship between The Hobbits.

Good.





Luisinan
638th Post



user profileedit/delete message

Red Carpet Regular Member



"Re(1):Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow.." , posted Tue 23 Dec 03:27post reply


quote:
I saw the movie, and I'll say what I've said about the entire LOTR trilogy: it's a good movie, but like Star Wars, it is WAY OVERRATED. Plus, it should be a crime to make movies THAT long.

Anyway, I think the most noteworthy thing about the LOTR theater experience was the previews. Of course, we have Spiderman 2 coming up. But the movie I really want to see is Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow. It's got that really cool retro-adventure feel that interests me like the original League of Extraordinary Gentlemen comic and other retro adventure movies like the Indiana Jones films. After watching the trailer for this movie, I can't wait to see the finished product.

And in case you're wondering, the trailer is online at http://www.skycaptain.com /.



Why does Sky Captain have the Stargate SG-1 theme in its trailer?

It does look interesting and is semi-exciting. But lacks a certain oomph. Its like as if they mashed Pearl Harbor with War of the Worlds together. And the trailers for Pearl Harbor did not incite any interest in me.

The question is whether the movie is supposed to be campy or serious? I think they might be going for a campy seriousness. But I'm not sure if that works.






Bored? "160"

Burning Ranger
599th Post



user profileedit/delete message

New Red Carpet Member



"Re(2):Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow.." , posted Tue 23 Dec 04:52post reply


quote:

Why does Sky Captain have the Stargate SG-1 theme in its trailer?

It does look interesting and is semi-exciting. But lacks a certain oomph. Its like as if they mashed Pearl Harbor with War of the Worlds together. And the trailers for Pearl Harbor did not incite any interest in me.

The question is whether the movie is supposed to be campy or serious? I think they might be going for a campy seriousness. But I'm not sure if that works.



Well, I have to admit that the trailer works differently for different people. For me, the movie represents a throwback to storytelling of a different time (1930s-40s). Think about how sci-fi writers envisioned technology back then (Buck Rogers and Flash Gordon would be good examples). It's a neat retreat from all the cyberpunk/mecha stuff we see nowadays.

And as for the Stargate music, it's usually common for trailers to use soundtracks from other movies, especially since original scores might not have been developed yet. I think I remember the original Armageddon trailer used music from The Rock.





Advanced Cyborg E. Branger AKA Burning Ranger

"Never underestimate the predictabilty of stupidity." -Vinnie Jones from SNATCH

Luisinan
639th Post



user profileedit/delete message

Red Carpet Regular Member



"Re(3):Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow.." , posted Tue 23 Dec 15:18post reply


quote:

Well, I have to admit that the trailer works differently for different people. For me, the movie represents a throwback to storytelling of a different time (1930s-40s). Think about how sci-fi writers envisioned technology back then (Buck Rogers and Flash Gordon would be good examples). It's a neat retreat from all the cyberpunk/mecha stuff we see nowadays.



It certainly has that retro/old-style/sylized feel but what else does it bring to the table? I know you can't answer that yet, cause we barely know anything about the movie but still it's a very valid question because summer Hollywood action movies often rely on some sort of gimmick to push them.

I'm still confused about the film. I mean, it has to be a campy film. The premise and the style demand that you not take it seriously and that you just have fun. But then you have serious or semi-serious actors in the leading roles. Hrm. This could be very, very, very good. Or very, very, very boring.

Guess it'll largely depend on the script and the acting (like always, yeah, obvious statement). Hrm.

BTW-- does anyone still take Angelina Jolie seriously? Honestly, she's getting all these leading roles and most of them are serious, dramatic roles. But after watching Tomb Raider 2 and seeing her in other trailers-- I can't take her seriously. I mean, I think she's good actress, but her real life is such a bizarre goof and some of her less serious roles have also been too bizarre and goofy (Lara Croft). Its like, when I see her giving a strong performance, in the back of my mind I think she's thinking "ha, ha, I am just f-ing with you. I'm really just a goofy/weird actress and I'm trying my hardest not to laugh while I read these lines."

anyway, end rant er whatever I just did.






Bored? "160"

Ikari Loona
61th Post



user profileedit/delete message

Occasional Customer

"Re(1):Return of the King" , posted Thu 25 Dec 07:51post reply


The return to Hobbitton felt so weird in the movie version... it's like they left to go shopping and nothing special happened while they were gone... At least in the book they were given a chance to show Hobbits can fend for themselves, since during most of LotR a great deal of the work was done by the other races of the Middle Earth...





Puchu?

"Beat the machine that works in your head!" - Guano Apes "Open Your Eyes"