| Original message ([an error occurred while processing this directive] Views )[an error occurred while processing this directive]
|
Replies:
|
| Dr Baghead 2480th Post
 
Platinum Carpet V.I.P- Board Master
    
    
    
    
    
|  "I'm gonna say Mars"
, posted Sun 24 Aug 11:41
quote:
This has been bothering me for a while now.
How the hell can you pick "Mars People" over Gen or Guy or somebody way way way way way way way way way...... way mothaf@#k'in better.
Because Playmore was all "you know what would be fun... let's upset that Messtu[sic] kids and put a Mars person in the game instead of someone good, like Leona or Vice/Mature!"
quote:
I don't mean to sound that hateful but com'on. Mars People?
You don't sound hatefull, you're right they need a better cheer then "C'mon Mars People!"... how about "Go Mars People, it's your birthday, whose your martian, Go Mars People"
quote:
Second question. Are they any good?
Nope, evil
quote:
I mean, are their moves tight or hot or something, or are they just another version of Suma Gorath.
Actually I've heard the controll for the game is on the loose side, hopefully though they fixed that after that Beta testing. And if you find the Mars People hot you're just sick!!! What's a Suma Gorath? That somekind of car or something?
quote:
Is there even a they or is it just one of'em?
I mean com'on Mars People?
well I'd think 'people' would clear that first part up... and you meant "Go Mars People, it's your birthday, whose your martian, Go Mars People" not "c'mon Mars People"
quote:
I'm just glad that "Violent Ken" doesn't know the Shun Goku Satsu.
Violent Ken 
And I'm sure Violent Ken is telling Violent Elisa right now "Boy I'm glad that Mettssau [sic] kid doesn't have a Shun Goku Satsu either!" then saying your name and laughing... but that's his way of hidding the pain your laughter has caused him! Apologies right now, young man!
 YAAAAAAAHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Devil May Cry:the movie - A ViewAskew Production?
Click the tag to see that Dante and more at Baghead's not-so-good custom figures page!
|
| Grave 587th Post
New Red Carpet Member
| "Re(3):Where did the Mars People come from?" , posted Mon 25 Aug 12:32
quote:
Personally, I think Violent Ken is not brainwashed by Vega(Dictator) or under SNH. He seems happy in the Artwork and no one ever brainwashed or under SNH ever seemed happy, while Orochi Blood can drive you quite insane. Yamazaki being the prime example.
The big question is weither or not he got injected with Orochi Blood like Rugal, or if Playmore will take a complete left turn in storyline and say he's of Orochi Lineage.
Nona's artwork is one thing... in-game, Violent Ken doesn't look exactly happy. I just think Nona's a madman, that's all, heheh.
No matter how they explain Violent Ken, I don't think it really matters. He's a cool character, and I prefer the orochi-style of "evil" characters to, say, the SFA2 SNH garbage. Ryu may have been evil, but you wouldn't have guessed it from looking at him. I did like how he appeared in CvS2, though... very cool. In fact, I kind of wish Violent Ken a dramatically different stance... heavy breathing, hunched over... oh, hell, I wish he was Orochi Ken. There, I said it.
Now, for a change of pace, next game, I want Good Akuma! A friendly guy who smiles and fights for justice while defending the weak, and... and...
...
nevermind.
|
| Hungrywolf 2264th Post
Platinum Carpet V.I.P- Board Master
| "Re(4):Where did the Mars People come from?" , posted Mon 25 Aug 15:20
quote:
Personally, I think Violent Ken is not brainwashed by Vega(Dictator) or under SNH. He seems happy in the Artwork and no one ever brainwashed or under SNH ever seemed happy, while Orochi Blood can drive you quite insane. Yamazaki being the prime example.
The big question is weither or not he got injected with Orochi Blood like Rugal, or if Playmore will take a complete left turn in storyline and say he's of Orochi Lineage.
Nona's artwork is one thing... in-game, Violent Ken doesn't look exactly happy. I just think Nona's a madman, that's all, heheh.
No matter how they explain Violent Ken, I don't think it really matters. He's a cool character, and I prefer the orochi-style of "evil" characters to, say, the SFA2 SNH garbage. Ryu may have been evil, but you wouldn't have guessed it from looking at him. I did like how he appeared in CvS2, though... very cool. In fact, I kind of wish Violent Ken a dramatically different stance... heavy breathing, hunched over... oh, hell, I wish he was Orochi Ken. There, I said it.
Now, for a change of pace, next game, I want Good Akuma! A friendly guy who smiles and fights for justice while defending the weak, and... and...
...
nevermind.
Hey, I heard you can unlock Hero Gouki on SvC:Chaos using the Konami code.
MESSATSU
Spoiler (Highlight to view) -
On a serious note, I think that it'd be cool if a joke character (or even a serious one) was made that was a good Gouki as opposed to an evil one.
End of Spoiler
"You're good baby I'll give you that.....but me? I'm magic!"
-Bullseye Daredevil movie
Hungry Like the Wolf
|
| iggy 1500th Post
Red Carpet V.I.P- Platinum Member
| "Re(6):Where did the Mars People come from?" , posted Mon 25 Aug 19:10:
quote:
...Isn't anybody going to mention yet that Violent Ken's japanese name says that he's brainwashed?
It's a good thing to call a character sennô something to make him different, but it would be nice to say WHO and WHY and HOW he was brainwashed before releasing him... Or maybe it's a cliffhanger to introduce the true evil character of the game (who will first appear in SvC 2 : cosmetic chaos (tentative title)).
The Mad Esthetician : "Hahaha! Ken, join me or I will make your hair look like... THIS!!!"
Ken : "AAAAHHHH!!! No! No!! OK, I will be your slave, but don't do this to my hair!"
The Mad Esthetician : "Hahaha! Now you're my slave! And as my slave, your first task will be to have your hair look... like THIS!"
Ken : "Hey! you said you won't do anything to my hair if I become your slave!"
The Mad Esthetician : "Yes, but I'm EVIL!! AHAHAHAHAHAHA!!"
Ken : "Noooooo!!!!!!"
Beware of the power of Kyo After Beeing Attacked By Horny Stray Cats, Hideous Make Up Sakura, Blacked Eyed Terry, Hazardous Liposuction With Desastrous Side Effects Chunli, and the most hideous of them all, Normal Guile!
"Même pas cap!" - Marie Trintignant
[this message was edited by iggy on Tue 26 Aug 00:42] |
| Luisinan 414th Post
Gold Customer
| "Re(7):Where did the Mars People come from?" , posted Mon 25 Aug 23:10
quote:
Hey, I heard you can unlock Hero Gouki on SvC:Chaos using the Konami code.
Actually you need to use the "Capcom Code" which is:
-Spend $60 on a game ($150 if you import)
-wait 7 months
-Buy "Super: Championship Edition Pro" for an additional $60 ($150)
Snootch to the Nootch
And the Capcom plan has worked for others too. Just look at ARC systems and the many Guilty Gear games coming out this year that aren't much different from earlier ones..
And you too can join the Capcom plan! For a low, low price you too can be flooding the market with marginally updated videogames!
YAMAMAYA
Yeah. And honestly, I think Capcom gets a bad rap on the endless upgrades thing. For one thing, the upgrades are meant to please the fans. For example, why did we get SF2-CE, cause people wanted to play as bosses. Why did we get HF, cause we wanted turbo speed. Why did we get ST, cause Super was too slow. People rag on Capcom and Capcom did make profit off the upgrades but the upgrades did bring something the players already wanted badly.
Secondly, Capcom hasn't really done endless upgrade thing in a long time anyway. CvS1 Special Edition (whatever it was called) was a 'stupid' upgrade. But other then that, Capcom has been cool. VS2 and VH2 just added characters that had been removed (Capcom catering to the fans). Street Fighter Zero 2 Alpha was kinda dumb too but it did change the game a bit and added Evil Ryu to the Japanese edition, plus added bonus games too!
I also wouldn't call the upgrades to SF3 as upgrades cause each iteration of SF3 was very different then the previous one and new characters were always added.
As for SFA2. I heard a rumor that SFA was a rushed job and that SFA2 was what SFA1 should have been. I kinda believe that because SFA1 lacked a lot of backgrounds (not to mention that most were pretty boring backgrounds). Dan didn't have a real ending in SFA1. And Evil Ryu didn't exist yet (a pivitol plot point in the Alpha series).
ARC systems could be accused of either milking their franchise or just wanting to fix their game. If they don't try and fix their game, players will lose interest or just stop playing cause the developer doesn't care about improving the game. Or they get accused of milking the franchise. Damned if you, damned if you don't. Irregardless, I wish these companies would realize how to make balanced games after making so many for so many years. ST, SS2 and KOF 98 are still probably the most balanced 2D fighters.
3S Chun Li
And no 3S is not balanced. I love that game but it is horribly unbalanced in high level play.
Bored? "160"
|
| Grave 596th Post
New Red Carpet Member
| "Re(8):Where did the Mars People come from?" , posted Tue 26 Aug 00:02
quote:
Yeah. And honestly, I think Capcom gets a bad rap on the endless upgrades thing. For one thing, the upgrades are meant to please the fans. For example, why did we get SF2-CE, cause people wanted to play as bosses. Why did we get HF, cause we wanted turbo speed. Why did we get ST, cause Super was too slow. People rag on Capcom and Capcom did make profit off the upgrades but the upgrades did bring something the players already wanted badly.
I think a lot of people who trash the way the SF2 games released just can't comprehend it because they weren't playing them at the time. I remember when CE came out, how excited I was to actually play the bosses... and Turbo was just awe-inspiring for me. Each upgrade did bring something new and exciting... and come on, even people who hate Akuma today have to admit that when he was new, he was a very shocking, exciting thing. I can enjoy each of the SF2 games seperately, but SSF2T is of course my favorite.
quote:
I also wouldn't call the upgrades to SF3 as upgrades cause each iteration of SF3 was very different then the previous one and new characters were always added.
To me, NG and 2I felt more like the same game, with an upgrade applied... 3S feels like a whole new game! Of course, people who trashed SF3 initially didn't get what they wanted... they wanted more familiar faces, and they just got more new characters... well, Akuma and Chun Li, too. And I for one loved the soundtrack... lots of hip-hop and dance music influences, a lot of people say it's too cheesy, but I liked it a lot. Especially Dudley's stage. Come on, "This is a stupid dope mix!" is great. 
Well, 2I was the first game with Alex's lowered voice, right? He sounds so girly in NG... and the parry timing changed every game, and... yeah. I don't know where this is going. Next point!
quote:
As for SFA2. I heard a rumor that SFA was a rushed job and that SFA2 was what SFA1 should have been. I kinda believe that because SFA1 lacked a lot of backgrounds (not to mention that most were pretty boring backgrounds). Dan didn't have a real ending in SFA1. And Evil Ryu didn't exist yet (a pivitol plot point in the Alpha series).
True or not, SFA1 felt pretty complete to me... just SFA2 brought a whole lot more to the table. The difference, to me, is that I feel SFA1 could have easily happened between SF and SF2, but the SFA2 plot keeps bringing in more SF2 characters and rewriting more of the plot, and by the time SFA3 came around, who knows what kind of plot still exists. I know what SFA was supposed to do originally, but now they seem like "what if?" games and nothing else.
|
| DarkZero
227th Post
Frequent Customer
| "Re(9):Where did the Mars People come from?" , posted Tue 26 Aug 06:23
quote:
I think a lot of people who trash the way the SF2 games released just can't comprehend it because they weren't playing them at the time. I remember when CE came out, how excited I was to actually play the bosses... and Turbo was just awe-inspiring for me. Each upgrade did bring something new and exciting... and come on, even people who hate Akuma today have to admit that when he was new, he was a very shocking, exciting thing. I can enjoy each of the SF2 games seperately, but SSF2T is of course my favorite.
I think a lot of the people who defend the way the SF2 games were released just can't comprehend how arcade games are released. Several of the Mortal Kombat games had two, three, or even four revisions, some of which actually added/unlocked new playable characters in addition to the usual bug fixes, balance adjustments, and speed adjustments. However, these revisions did not have home console releases, and were in fact not even billed as new games. Mortal Kombat had four revisions, Mortal Kombat 2 had at least one revision, and Mortal Kombat 4 had four revisions, but only one version of each had a console release: the last revision. Capcom and ARC both had/have console releases for every single revision of their game, making money off of them while they effectively use their customers as beta testers to refine their product. This is a much seedier way to do business than the standard model that other arcade developers have always used for their console releases.
|
| Grave 597th Post
New Red Carpet Member
| "Re(10):Where did the Mars People come from?" , posted Tue 26 Aug 09:42
quote:
I think a lot of the people who defend the way the SF2 games were released just can't comprehend how arcade games are released. Several of the Mortal Kombat games had two, three, or even four revisions, some of which actually added/unlocked new playable characters in addition to the usual bug fixes, balance adjustments, and speed adjustments. However, these revisions did not have home console releases, and were in fact not even billed as new games. Mortal Kombat had four revisions, Mortal Kombat 2 had at least one revision, and Mortal Kombat 4 had four revisions, but only one version of each had a console release: the last revision. Capcom and ARC both had/have console releases for every single revision of their game, making money off of them while they effectively use their customers as beta testers to refine their product. This is a much seedier way to do business than the standard model that other arcade developers have always used for their console releases.
I think MK4 was the only one with a revision that actually added gameplay features, short of fighting Reptile in MK1, which I had never seen anyone do until the home versions, anyway. You're giving them too much credit. Most of these revisions were big bugfixes. Do you remember the MK2 bug where Sub-Zero could do the first part of the freeze fatality mid-round, and you wouldn't be able to move until time ran out? Yeah, I don't think I'd buy a home version like that. And look at the info for MK4 version 1.0... the game wasn't done. No endings, even. The difference between this and the SF2 games is that each SF2 game was complete and could stand on its own. No one was forcing gamers to buy them. They often did it quite willingly.
I could see people bitching about buying buggy software, then being forced to upgrade to fixed versions at an even higher cost. However, the SF2 upgrades brought things the fans asked for. I don't feel that there's anything unfinished about any of them.
|
| Sano
206th Post
Frequent Customer
| "Re(4):Where did the Mars People come from?" , posted Tue 26 Aug 10:30
quote:
Nona's artwork is one thing... in-game, Violent Ken doesn't look exactly happy. I just think Nona's a madman, that's all, heheh.
No matter how they explain Violent Ken, I don't think it really matters. He's a cool character, and I prefer the orochi-style of "evil" characters to, say, the SFA2 SNH garbage. Ryu may have been evil, but you wouldn't have guessed it from looking at him. I did like how he appeared in CvS2, though... very cool. In fact, I kind of wish Violent Ken a dramatically different stance... heavy breathing, hunched over... oh, hell, I wish he was Orochi Ken. There, I said it.
Now, for a change of pace, next game, I want Good Akuma! A friendly guy who smiles and fights for justice while defending the weak, and... and...
...
nevermind.
If SNH Ryu doesn't appear to be Evil, that's actually a correct interpretation. He's only called Evil Ryu in the U.S. In the Japanese games he is simply called "Ryu" and guide books refer to him as "Satsui No Ryu" or "Satsui No Hado Ryu." Much like Orochi Iori is always called Iori in Japanese games.
SNH Ryu is not really Evil, that's just Capcom USA making stuff up. He has a strong desire to kill opponents, but doesn't want to rule the world or harm innocents or anything like that. I mean, he's no Saint either but he's not all that bad. In official Storyline he only existed long enought to scar Sagat. If you want in-game evidence of this, Chun-Li tells all Evil people in CVS2 to surrender. She does not say this to SNH Ryu.
So, it turns out Ken is brainwashed? Perhaps Nona is insane. Maybe it was his idea to add Mars People!
Using Vice and Mature, Goenitz can Brainwash people too like he did to Saisyu. Maybe he's the culprit? He could give Ken some Orochi Blood as well like he did to Rugal.
|
| Grave 598th Post
New Red Carpet Member
| "Re(2):Re(10):Where did the Mars People come f" , posted Tue 26 Aug 12:14
quote:
SNH Ryu is not really Evil, that's just Capcom USA making stuff up. He has a strong desire to kill opponents, but doesn't want to rule the world or harm innocents or anything like that. I mean, he's no Saint either but he's not all that bad. In official Storyline he only existed long enought to scar Sagat. If you want in-game evidence of this, Chun-Li tells all Evil people in CVS2 to surrender. She does not say this to SNH Ryu.
So... wait a sec. Sagat receives the scar after the first SF, and before SF2, yes? Now, I've never seen the ending of SF1, mostly because I couldn't beat Sagat the only times I've played it, but I've heard several times that Ryu gave Sagat the scar when he defeated him. But the SFA games are supposed to take place between SF1 and SF2, but... Sagat already has the scar! And SNH Ryu only initially appears in SFA2, so maybe SFA1 really was incomplete, like someone said. But... Sagat still has the scar already! So what's the deal? I've never known much about the official plot of the SFA games, especially surrounding SNH Ryu, and I'm really interested to know... so if someone would like to explain, I'd be very happy.
quote:
The primary reason there were so many "upgrades" to SF 2 is because most of the staff who worked on SF 2 had left the company; they were desperate for a sequel, but had no man power to do so, so they simply made small and easy-to-do gameplay alterations (this is probably one of the reasons most of the first-generation Street Fighter super moves consist of somebody doing one of their special moves three times in a row.. ;D)
Haha! But I'd hardly call SSF2 and SSF2T small alterations from the original SF2... by then, things were a lot different. Still, that does make a lot of sense.
|
| DarkZero
230th Post
Frequent Customer
| "Re(2):Re(10):Where did the Mars People come f" , posted Tue 26 Aug 14:52
quote:
I think MK4 was the only one with a revision that actually added gameplay features, short of fighting Reptile in MK1, which I had never seen anyone do until the home versions, anyway. You're giving them too much credit. Most of these revisions were big bugfixes. Do you remember the MK2 bug where Sub-Zero could do the first part of the freeze fatality mid-round, and you wouldn't be able to move until time ran out? Yeah, I don't think I'd buy a home version like that. And look at the info for MK4 version 1.0... the game wasn't done. No endings, even. The difference between this and the SF2 games is that each SF2 game was complete and could stand on its own. No one was forcing gamers to buy them. They often did it quite willingly.
I could see people bitching about buying buggy software, then being forced to upgrade to fixed versions at an even higher cost. However, the SF2 upgrades brought things the fans asked for. I don't feel that there's anything unfinished about any of them.
Actually, you're right. I just looked further into it and it turns out that there are four revisions of Street Fighter 2, which doesn't count any of the rename versions. I had assumed that one of the renamed versions fixed bugs like Guile's handcuffs and Dhalsim's invisibility, but it turns out that those were actually fixed in revisions to SF2. So all of the renamed versions probably have their own revisions and are more than just bugfixes.
|
| Siegfried 274th Post
Copper Customer
| "Re(4):Re(10):Where did the Mars People come f" , posted Tue 26 Aug 16:22
Grave, if you're really interested in learning more about the SF storyline, try this FAQ:
http://kattuggla.oru.se/dmd01/dm0103/test
Choose Sources, FAQs and Links and scroll down to Tiamat's SF Storyline FAQ.
Anyway, about the console releases. They didn't release all games on all consoles, and when they did they only converted the latest version.
SNES was the first home console to get a SF so it got the first edition. When Capcom rebelled and made Genesis games, Champ Ed was available so they made that (in fact, Turbo was just out so a few features snuck inside as well). Turbo was then released for SNES and had a bunch of new moves and the bosses, so it was more or less a new game for SNES owners. And then when Super appeared on SNES and Genesis, it had another four characters over the previous versions. Super Turbo wasn't released on any of them, and the others (3DO, PC, etc) didn't have a SF2 to begin with.
It's really worse with Tecmo making seven slightly different versions of DoA2 during 2000 alone...
----------------
Webmaster of Fighter Mania
kattuggla.oru.se/dmd01/dm0103/test/
|
| Grave 605th Post
Red Carpet Regular Member
| "Re(5):Re(10):Where did the Mars People come f" , posted Tue 26 Aug 16:41
quote:
SNES was the first home console to get a SF so it got the first edition. When Capcom rebelled and made Genesis games, Champ Ed was available so they made that (in fact, Turbo was just out so a few features snuck inside as well). Turbo was then released for SNES and had a bunch of new moves and the bosses, so it was more or less a new game for SNES owners. And then when Super appeared on SNES and Genesis, it had another four characters over the previous versions. Super Turbo wasn't released on any of them, and the others (3DO, PC, etc) didn't have a SF2 to begin with.
Thanks for the link! I'll check it later...
Minor comments on the above. You forgot that PC Engine got SF2'/CE without the Turbo enhancements of the Genesis Special Champion Edition. Furthermore, it's kinda funny that you mention 3DO and PC after saying SSF2T didn't get any home versions, as it appeared on both of those systems. In fact, Capcom released a 3DO version of their SFC CP Soldier controller for it. I haven't played the PC version myself, but I do know it exists... I have some old ads I could dig up and scan, if anyone cared.
|
| Luisinan 415th Post
Gold Customer
| "SF 1.5 "The Wonder Years"" , posted Tue 26 Aug 19:04
Just more random thoughts...
SFA was an exciting idea that I think got mutated by Capcom. IMO, SFA was supposed to be the origin of SF2 but it sort of became a retelling or fleshing out of SF2. What I mean was that when SFA came out, it felt like Ryu, Ken and Chun Li were really young and this was the game series that would tell you how they became the World Warriors in ST. But as the sequels went by the story sort of became a watered down prequel to SF2. The Alpha series should have been about the 'old days' when everyone was young. But it didn't, and here is why.
Firstly, Sakura. Sakura is a great and terrible design and an interesting character. But she fits a lot better in SF3 then in SFA. By adding Sakura into SFA, she takes away Ryu's youthfulness. SFA is about a young, learning Ryu. That idea gets totally blown away by having a wannabe apprentice. Bad move Capcom!
Secondly, Bison is too powerful. This is the early days, why the hell does Bison already have his three grandmasters and Birdie and Cammy plus the dolls. WTF!? He's a lot more powerful now then in SF2. If SF2 was story about Bison reclaiming the power he lost in SFA then it's okay. But because SFA is a newer game, it's bad to have a story where you already know the ending. It would have been more interesting to learn how Bison got the power he has in SF2 instead of learning how he lost it. SFA Bison was a good idea. SFA3 Bison is terrible.
Thirdly, too much emphasis on SF2 characters. SFA should have been about what happened before SF2, like how SF3 was about what happened afterwards. Where is Ryu's master? Guy's master? Bison's master? Sagat's master or rival? Only masters we get are Gen and Akuma and Charlie to some extent.
IMO the Alpha series was a great waste of potential. The series adds quite a bit to the SF mythology (Dan, Sakura, the dolls, Satsui no Hado, and the Final Fight saga) but it didn't explore what it should have explored-- the true origins of SF. Instead it's a sidestory. And well, that's disappointing. The series should have been called SF 1.5 "The Wonder Years" or something like that.
End rant.
And I call Evil Ryu, evil just cause its convinient. I'm not a total gaijin you guys.
Haaaaaaaruuuuuuuu! Ichiban!
Bored? "160"
|
| Grave 608th Post
Red Carpet Regular Member
| "Re(1):SF 1.5" , posted Tue 26 Aug 19:47
Lots of good points, I agree with most of them... but I think they've gone too far with SFA and they have too many characters with too many conflicting backstories going on to ever fix things... unless they make a new game that nullifies all of that!
quote:
Thirdly, too much emphasis on SF2 characters. SFA should have been about what happened before SF2, like how SF3 was about what happened afterwards. Where is Ryu's master? Guy's master? Bison's master? Sagat's master or rival? Only masters we get are Gen and Akuma and Charlie to some extent.
A lot of people didn't like SF3 for not explaining what happened to the old characters, and for bringing in mostly new ones... would an earlier-in-the-story game with a few familiar characters and mostly new ones being playable have that same kind of problem? I don't know... personally, I'd like to see Gouken in a fighting game finally, but who knows.
Also, the more I read up on the series, the more I wonder why everyone calls Ken, Ryu, Akuma, etc "shotos" when their syle is ansatsuken, not shotokan... hmm.
|
| Ishmael 851th Post
Red Carpet Regular Member++
| "Re(4):Re(10):Where did the Mars People come f" , posted Wed 27 Aug 10:25
While I suspect that most game companies aren't as concerned about making the plots from one fighting game to another match up as some fans are I'm not going to begrudge anyone who tries to get dozens of contradictory plot strings to fit together into a cohesive whole. But instead of trying to shoehorn everything into one big string of continuity it might be easier to view the games as variations on the same idea. Sort of like how comic books have Golden Age, Silver Age, Plutonium Age or whatever, the same basic ideas get re-used even if the characters and details get changed. Changes between SF2, SF3, and SFA are all easier to understand that way. Or maybe thinking of it as different adaptations of the same story might work better. One SF game could be the 1933 King Kong, another could be the Dino De Laurentiis King Kong, and those goofy Marvel games could be King Kong vs Godzilla. I'm not sure if any of that makes sense or if I'm laying the groundwork for Ryu to team up with Golden Age Ryu to fight a giant monkey.
quote:
Kinda off the subject at hand, but I've been looking for an old SF2 machine that Guile's handcuffs and the magic throw would work on... never been able to find one, and even if I did, I never got it to work, anyway. I wonder if there's a bugged rom out there... I've always been interested in seeing big glitches like that.
If I remember those tricks worked on any SF2:WW game. Don't the glitches work on the rom of the game as well?
|
| Sano
210th Post
Frequent Customer
| "Re(5):Re(10):Where did the Mars People come f" , posted Wed 27 Aug 10:43
Capcom actually did care because in SF2 Revival for the GBA they changed certain character's endings to tie in with the SFA series, like Cammy being told by Vega(dictator) she's a clone, and Blanka knowing his name is Jimmy since Dan knew his name in SFA.
Apparently, Capcom doesn't care anymore, as they told Erik Ko of Studio Udon who is making the U.S. SF Comic that each game exists in it's own continuity and there is no cohesive storyline. I can only attribute this change in attitude towards Okamoto leaving? I don't know. I'm not exactly sure who Erik Ko spoke to either. The SF Eternal Art Book does have a relationship chart with all the characters, and while it could of been more descriptive, SFA characters are with SF2 Characters (Course SF2 Characters are SFA Characters) to indicate some cohesivness. The SF3 Characters are seperated from everyone else, as Storyline wise it is very unconnected to SFA and SF2.
This will all come in to play when we get a new SF game, maybe next year, or maybe five years from now or who knows when with so many conflicting reports.
|
|
|
"Re(5):Where did the Mars People come from?" 
