Original message ([an error occurred while processing this directive] Views )[an error occurred while processing this directive]
| Replies:
|
Fuchikoma 240th Post

 
Frequent Customer
   
| "Re(1):Random jump in-age" , posted Sun 29 Sep 17:22
quote: ahahahahaha those are hillarious!
despite being nude, they're done pretty good, as good as any clothed models. just slap some clothes on them and you're set (except for that first one. gotta wipe the, uh, milk off her first. yes, that's it. she craved a big glass of milk one day and uh). i especially like that Naru one (with the heart and ribbon). but ehh, there's probably already a clothed Narusegawa out there somewhere
You wouldn't really have to slap clothes on them... those models have been altered mostly from swimsuit model kits, They just sand down the body, make a few anatomical corrections... and there you go. I don't see the point in all the work though, I'd never have something like that sitting out on display.
|
RugalBernstein 2477th Post

 
Platinum Carpet V.I.P- Board Master
    
    
    
    
   
| "Re(9):So you like like models eh?" , posted Sun 29 Sep 20:03:
quote:
Explain? And I don't think Eric's comment was directed at Japanese, I don't think he was making a over-generalization that all Japanese are that way.
Explain what? Kiddie porn? It speaks for itself. Of course, if you're wondering about the legality of it, depictions of nude children are legal in the U.S. provided there is no penetration or " sexual actions of any kind. " Pictures of nude minors are only permitted if it is some form of " artistic photography ", in other words. Not like that stops perverts from making use of it. Also, the Japanese statement could CERTAINLY be clarified, especially considering he's repeatedly said similar things in the past, including bashing Kabuki theatre because the male roles are played by women ( of course, Kabuki was originally quite the opposite; ALL roles were played by women, but the Tokugawa shogunate banned this because of its close links to prostitution. )
Update: Interesting observation there, Sab10. Ha ha ha, did you figure that out all by yourself?
[this message was edited by RugalBernstein on Sun 29 Sep 20:07] |
Hungrywolf 1558th Post

 
Red Carpet V.I.P- Platinum Member

    
    
    
   
| "Re(10):So you like like models eh?" , posted Sun 29 Sep 22:16
quote:
Explain? And I don't think Eric's comment was directed at Japanese, I don't think he was making a over-generalization that all Japanese are that way. Explain what? Kiddie porn? It speaks for itself. Of course, if you're wondering about the legality of it, depictions of nude children are legal in the U.S. provided there is no penetration or " sexual actions of any kind. " Pictures of nude minors are only permitted if it is some form of " artistic photography ", in other words. Not like that stops perverts from making use of it. Also, the Japanese statement could CERTAINLY be clarified, especially considering he's repeatedly said similar things in the past, including bashing Kabuki theatre because the male roles are played by women ( of course, Kabuki was originally quite the opposite; ALL roles were played by women, but the Tokugawa shogunate banned this because of its close links to prostitution. )
Update: Interesting observation there, Sab10. Ha ha ha, did you figure that out all by yourself?
Well, I haven't heard all that stuff Eric has said then, as I don't read every single thread. I suppose he has made comments before that have riled people up though. I don't know why he'd make a big deal that the male roles were played by women. In original theatre, all roles, male and female, were played by men. Same difference. What's the big deal with that? Yeah, I agree, it could've been clarified, I'm just trying to make things seem better than they were I guess...
 "Someday we'll find it the rainbow connection..." -Kermit The Muppet Movie Hungry Like the Wolf
|
|
|