| Original message ([an error occurred while processing this directive] Views )
|
Replies:
|
| talbaineric 2845th Post
 
Platinum Carpet V.I.P- Board Master
    
    
    
    
     
|  "Re(3):DOA 3 VS Tekken 4? Which is better?"
, posted Thu 21 Mar 18:50
VF4 isn't that great,played it. The graphics are beautiful,but I've still seen better,and the characters are boring.
Tekken 4 has the sexy Christie Montero,and the wicked cool Steve Fox! And while it's a button-masher,IMO,it's still my pick!
DOA3 isn't that great. The characters didn't suit me at all,except for Christie,naturally,and Kasumi.
|
| Hungrywolf 494th Post
Gold Customer
| "Re(7):DOA 3 VS Tekken 4? Which is better?" , posted Tue 26 Mar 18:32
quote:
Tekken 4, not as good as TTT but still way better than DoA3. DoA3 is still a game of rock-paper-scissors. Tekken 4 already has that and a lot more. Plus DoA's story STILL makes no sense, the outfits are STILL fetishist garbage, and they really need to spread out the fighting styles more (too many ninjas, no Brasilian arts).
For tightness of gameplay, VF4 beats them both... the characters look really bad by comparison though, which is pretty bad when you consider this is the best VF characters have ever looked.
I like DoA3 best....besides, it has Ryu Hayabusa, and that makes it great. I have nothing against the character designs. It is true that a lot of it is fanservice, but still, I like a lot of the costumes. And it's a good game because friends of mine that don't give me any challenge in games like CvS2 and KoF and SF can beat me often in DoA2 or 3. It takes a lot of practice to actually master things in the DoA games, like reversals, I'm starting to get better though. Some of my friends that are girls love to play DoA2 and if they get into it, it can eventually help them get into other fighters, so it's all good. I love DoA2 and 3. I admit the first one wasn't that great, and if you think that 2 and 3 have fanservice, you should see the bouncing in DoA. No lie, it is rediculous in the first DoA. Has anyone else played the first one?
|
| Shin ATproof
147th Post
Regular Customer
| "Re(8):DOA 3 VS Tekken 4? Which is better?" , posted Tue 26 Mar 19:41
quote:
I like DoA3 best....besides, it has Ryu Hayabusa, and that makes it great. I have nothing against the character designs. It is true that a lot of it is fanservice, but still, I like a lot of the costumes. And it's a good game because friends of mine that don't give me any challenge in games like CvS2 and KoF and SF can beat me often in DoA2 or 3. It takes a lot of practice to actually master things in the DoA games, like reversals, I'm starting to get better though. Some of my friends that are girls love to play DoA2 and if they get into it, it can eventually help them get into other fighters, so it's all good. I love DoA2 and 3. I admit the first one wasn't that great, and if you think that 2 and 3 have fanservice, you should see the bouncing in DoA. No lie, it is rediculous in the first DoA. Has anyone else played the first one?
I too like DoA3 a lot...I like Tekken 4, DoA3 and VF4 about equally. DoA is fun...like MvC2 fun and Tekken is like 3rdStrike fun and VF is like KoF98 fun...fun fun fun. DoA just has tons of unknown and underappreciated potential. It's a really complex fighter but people for the most part shrug it off as simply a fighter about hooters. I just played DoA1 not to long ago and then comparing the DoA2 and DoA3 to DoA1...that whole "DoA is simply fanservice" argument flew out the window...the fanservice in the first was absurd and blatant regardless of the fact the game was still fun as hell to play but each DoA game has got more complex and less about fanservice and more about gameplay...actually from a distance the Fanservice is only slightly more than the average fighter...hell take any modern fighter today and there are atleast a few fanservice characters. DoA just give what the fans want fetish outfits for their favorite female character...I don't see any King, Mai, Chunli, Morrigan fanboys getting that...regardless if they drool over those characters about the same as the silly DoA fanboy who plays it for the chicks(She kicks high)so is it because DoA players can do that makes the game less serious? Ya know? All I can do is laugh at those who believe that.
"Kore ga...Kusanagi no ken da!!!"
"I AM GODZILLA...YOU ARE JAPAN!!!"
|
| Hungrywolf 496th Post
Gold Customer
| "Re(9):DOA 3 VS Tekken 4? Which is better?" , posted Tue 26 Mar 21:19
quote:
I like DoA3 best....besides, it has Ryu Hayabusa, and that makes it great. I have nothing against the character designs. It is true that a lot of it is fanservice, but still, I like a lot of the costumes. And it's a good game because friends of mine that don't give me any challenge in games like CvS2 and KoF and SF can beat me often in DoA2 or 3. It takes a lot of practice to actually master things in the DoA games, like reversals, I'm starting to get better though. Some of my friends that are girls love to play DoA2 and if they get into it, it can eventually help them get into other fighters, so it's all good. I love DoA2 and 3. I admit the first one wasn't that great, and if you think that 2 and 3 have fanservice, you should see the bouncing in DoA. No lie, it is rediculous in the first DoA. Has anyone else played the first one?
I too like DoA3 a lot...I like Tekken 4, DoA3 and VF4 about equally. DoA is fun...like MvC2 fun and Tekken is like 3rdStrike fun and VF is like KoF98 fun...fun fun fun. DoA just has tons of unknown and underappreciated potential. It's a really complex fighter but people for the most part shrug it off as simply a fighter about hooters. I just played DoA1 not to long ago and then comparing the DoA2 and DoA3 to DoA1...that whole "DoA is simply fanservice" argument flew out the window...the fanservice in the first was absurd and blatant regardless of the fact the game was still fun as hell to play but each DoA game has got more complex and less about fanservice and more about gameplay...actually from a distance the Fanservice is only slightly more than the average fighter...hell take any modern fighter today and there are atleast a few fanservice characters. DoA just give what the fans want fetish outfits for their favorite female character...I don't see any King, Mai, Chunli, Morrigan fanboys getting that...regardless if they drool over those characters about the same as the silly DoA fanboy who plays it for the chicks(She kicks high)so is it because DoA players can do that makes the game less serious? Ya know? All I can do is laugh at those who believe that.
Good points, Shin. I try to be open about fighters and am trying to get into Tekken now. I mean, I just recently got Bloody Roar on my GCN and I know it has extremely easy controls but that helps make it fun and easy for newcomers to jump in to. I just get tired of people putting DoA2 or 3 down because they are full of fanservice. I use Kasumi a lot but usually I use Hayabusa. And Zack looks so funny in that shiny outfit in DoA2. I hope I get a chance to play VF4 soon. I'm starting to get into 3d fighters more and more, but I love the 2d ones too. I guess I'm rambling now, but I find it odd how much more open-minded I have become about 3d games, because I was always against them because I was such a huge fan of KoF and Street Fighter. Just know that Soul Calibur and DoA2 were responsible for me getting into 3d fighters. :) I love my Dreamcast.
|
| Gojira 283th Post
Copper Customer
| "Re(8):DOA 3 VS Tekken 4? Which is better?" , posted Wed 27 Mar 03:49
quote:
I like DoA3 best....besides, it has Ryu Hayabusa, and that makes it great. I have nothing against the character designs. It is true that a lot of it is fanservice, but still, I like a lot of the costumes. And it's a good game because friends of mine that don't give me any challenge in games like CvS2 and KoF and SF can beat me often in DoA2 or 3. It takes a lot of practice to actually master things in the DoA games, like reversals, I'm starting to get better though. Some of my friends that are girls love to play DoA2 and if they get into it, it can eventually help them get into other fighters, so it's all good. I love DoA2 and 3. I admit the first one wasn't that great, and if you think that 2 and 3 have fanservice, you should see the bouncing in DoA. No lie, it is rediculous in the first DoA. Has anyone else played the first one?
Actually I consider the first game to be the best in the series, simply because it was a very good game for being made from scratch. I saw great potential in it despite being too simple, and figured they would add better stuff in the sequel and balance it out more. But DoA2 expanded on it for the worse IMHO. Rather than focus on making reversals a balanced affair, or punishing predictable defense patterns, or making multithrows anything but stupid, they just added more stupid things to it to accomodate the more detailed graphics: worthless 3D movement so you can see the landscapes and breakaway platforms better, more chances to do reversals so you can see the overdone reversal animations. And then they did the SAME THING for DoA3. Unforgivable.
The lead guy insulting Tekken didn't help him much to gain my respect either. That was just an outright lack of professionalism.
|
|
|
"Which is better? Thats easy!" 
